In the exhilarating world of digital wagering, waiting for commerce on the internet can dampen the spirit. Cryptocurrencies, with their ability to facilitate swift transfers, eliminate the issue. With faster financial process speeds, Jet Casino ensures seamless enjoyment for enthusiasts, reducing unnecessary waiting periods. Perhaps one of the most striking advantages of cryptocurrencies is their global reach. Unlike traditional money, cryptocurrencies face no geographic boundaries. They provide a universal solution, enabling people from different corners of the world to participate in the virtual gambling sphere. More and more gaming websites leverage the feature to expand their user base and embrace patrons from various locations. This worldwide access invigorates the industry, fostering a truly global community.

Embracing the Future

Today’s digital gambling websites are gradually adopting crypt opportunities, recognizing the myriad benefits they offer. Jet Casino exemplifies the trend, having integrated cryptocurrencies into its transaction methods. By doing so, it not only caters to the changing preferences of its patrons but also positions itself at the forefront of this ongoing evolution in the industry.

The integration of virtual money and gambling on the internet marks a significant shift in the industry’s landscape. These digital currencies’ unique characteristics pave the way for a more secure, swift, and inclusive betting environment. In the end, the rise is more than just a trend; it’s a testament to the industry’s adaptability and readiness to embrace the future. Jet Casino, among other platforms, is riding the wave of transformation, heralding a new era in the world of online wagering. As cryptos solutions continue to gain popularity, more and more similar resources will lead the charge, crafting a new narrative in the world of online wagering. The vast world of cryptocurrencies houses myriad types of them, each with unique attributes. Among these, some stand out for their suitability in the realm of the industry of chance.

Bitcoin: Illuminating the Digital Wagering Landscape

It is the cornerstone of the Internet commerce realm. It has been instrumental in shaping various sectors, including gambling at Jet Casino. This digital asset’s unique characteristics make it a preferred choice among patrons and platforms alike, transforming the landscape of the chance industry. Bitcoin transactions offer an enhanced level of anonymity, a valued feature in the wagering world. Unlike conventional banking methods, they bypass the need for personal identification details, thereby bolstering privacy and security. The inherent anonymity presents an appealing facet for patrons who prefer to keep their identities protected during virtual wagering activities.

Furthermore, Bitcoin’s robust security adds to its allure in the online gaming industry. This heightened security enables Jet Casino to indulge in its favourite activities with assured peace of mind. Underpinned by blockchain technology, commerce operations are encrypted and decentralized, offering formidable protection against potential fraud and breaches.

The Ethereum Influence: Smart Contracts and Wagering

Another notable mention is Ethereum. Unlike Bitcoin, this isn’t just a cryptocurrency; it’s a platform that enables Smart Contracts and Distributed Applications (DApps) to be built and run without downtime, fraud, control, or interference from a third party.

The feature holds significant potential for the betting industry, paving the way for fairer, transparent transactions. It is worth noting that Jet Casino and several others now accept Ether (ETH), the native currency of Ethereum. By doing so, they unlock new levels of convenience and fairness for their patrons. This diversification ensures that more patrons can engage in virtual wagering, regardless of their cryptocurrency preference.

The post Decoding Cryptocurrencies On The New Crown Jewels in the Realm of Digital Wagering appeared first on B_Sai.

For example, economist Alex Krueger suggested that the cryptocurrency could be killed by governments by “crushing” it with short positions. Another option is an order from China that would force all miners to unite and take over the BTC network with a 51% attack. The most controversial plot is the death of bitcoin at the hands of its creator, Satoshi Nakamoto.

Right now, however, bitcoin is fine. It has been running almost uninterrupted since 2009, even though the media, according to 99bitcoins.com, has buried the cryptocurrency at least 380 times. But what if one of those scenarios actually happens? Everything written below is just fantasy on a given topic, not a proven theory. Bans, bans, bans What the end of cryptocurrency will be and whether it will come to anyone is unknown. But if it happens, the governments of large countries will probably play a significant role in it. It could happen if they prohibit one by one all forms of interaction with digital assets.

You can’t trade, you can’t store. The crypto industry is unlikely to collapse instantly, as evidenced by China’s experience. Since 2014, banks in the Middle Kingdom are forbidden to service accounts related to cryptocurrency trading, and since 2017. – There is a taboo on ICOs. However, these restrictions do not prevent Chinese traders from being a significant part of the cryptocurrency community. Nevertheless, such bans, backed by harsh sanctions, will not go away. First and foremost, it will lead to capital outflows from the crypto industry. Small traders will withdraw their savings, fearing that their savings will turn into souvenirs for their great-grandchildren. Large investors will also try to withdraw funds invested in startups that previously showed great promise. However, they are unlikely to get their money without losses.

The most common ways to cash out cryptocurrencies are through exchangers or directly from exchanges. If governments ban digital money, most of the companies and services that provide services in this area will immediately stop working. The rest will probably be located in jurisdictions where cryptocurrency trading is not yet prohibited, or will go against the law. One way or another, we can assume that these exchangers will significantly increase the fees for the services provided. And it will get bigger the stricter the regulation will be.

Many will lose money… maybe all

But high withdrawal fees are only one of the problems. Another is the sharp decline in the price of digital assets. A ban on cryptocurrencies may well make them an extremely unattractive investment, including due to cash-out problems. As a result, coin holders will sell coins en masse. This will lead to multiple liquidations of traders’ long positions. The result will be a repeat of the cascading collapse that happened on March 13, when bitcoin lost more than 50% of its price within a day. However, this time the crisis of the crypto market will be many times more critical. Back in March, there were investors who bought digital assets that helped keep their prices from going into negative territory. If cryptocurrencies were to be banned everywhere, there would be far fewer buyers. Of course, they won’t pay to take cryptocurrency away. However, it is likely that traders will have a second chance to buy bitcoin at $1. Ad on exchanges Exchanges will be key players in the case of a complete ban on digital money.

Trading floors must hold large volumes of cryptocurrency in their accounts. This is the operating capital that companies use to maintain liquidity, a safety cushion, and savings. Because of this, once the global government raises a red flag, some of the venues … will simply shut down. They will need to convert their existing cryptocurrency into legitimate money as soon as possible before it depreciates. And customers will only be left to reload the exchange’s web page in the hope that it’s a bad prank. In the meantime, the owners of exchanges whose operations have suddenly turned out to be a crime will collect their own and their clients’ digital coins and send them to other trading platforms that have not yet suffered at the hand of the law. The platforms have enormous stocks of cryptocurrencies. Therefore, selling them will lead to sharp and unpredictable drops in token prices.

We already observed a similar situation on Binance on March 12. Then the rate of altcoin Link momentarily fell from $2.2 to $0.0001. The situation will be aggravated by industrial miners, who put aside mined bitcoin, expecting it to rise in price to $40,000 after halving (this forecast was made by Tom Lee, co-founder of Fundstrat Global Advisors). A speculator’s nightmare To imagine what will happen on exchanges after the sudden ban of cryptocurrency, the experience of dying trading platforms will help. When a platform shows the first signs of financial difficulties, its users start withdrawing capital from it. And that only worsens the company’s situation. If the exchange’s clients withdraw their funds, it means that the trading volume on it decreases. And it is the main source of income – platforms earn on traders’ commissions for transactions. When the situation becomes critical, the platform usually shuts down the withdrawal of cryptocurrencies, and then its representatives can, for example, report bankruptcy. Such a case occurred in November with the Canadian exchange Einstein Exchange.

Not being able to withdraw cryptocurrency from their account is always a big surprise to most traders. Therefore, users, not understanding what is happening and trying to preserve capital, start to panic and buy all coins in a row and try to withdraw them from the exchange. As a result, the price of digital assets fluctuates randomly up and down, completely disregarding the market average. In the case of a total ban on cryptocurrency, this chaos will affect most exchanges. And, on the one hand, such a storm is an ideal opportunity to multiply your capital in a matter of hours. But only in cryptocurrency.

A speculator remains a speculator

As practice shows, even in the most desperate situation a cold-blooded speculator remains himself. In the fall of 2018, the small Bitflip exchange went bankrupt. Intermittent disruptions to cryptocurrency withdrawals began back in the spring. However, closer to September, the ability to withdraw funds disappeared for good. When this became known to the general public, chaos began on the site. Bitcoin was rising to $20,000, when the market average for the coin was around $6,000. Some cryptocurrencies went up in price by hundreds of times. The reason-speculators were reporting in chat that a particular token could still be withdrawn from the exchange. Users, clinging to the last opportunity to save their savings, bought up the coin, pushing its price much higher. Of course, there was no way to withdraw the money. Perhaps someone can still benefit from this situation. For example, if a trader manages to buy bitcoin at $1 on one exchange and transfer it to another exchange based in a country where the cryptocurrency is not yet banned. But even if the site’s withdrawal is not disabled, the question is: Who will conduct the transaction? Will miners spend thousands of dollars to mine the ghost of an independent payment system? This is unlikely, so the blockchain of the first cryptocurrency, and all others, will freeze, and most likely forever. In addition, the miners will have their own concerns. As soon as cryptocurrency will be banned and it will become unprofitable to mine it, all mining equipment will lose its value. And if the video cards can still be sold, earning at least some money, the ASIC-mainers and other devices that specialize exclusively in mining digital coins, will not be needed. On April 17, scientists from Oxford University said in a blog post that cryptocurrencies could threaten the entire financial system. If the digital asset market and the stock market are linked, the collapse of one could affect the other, experts said. “As history teaches us, in times of crisis it is especially important to reduce systemic risk, that is, the risk that the collapse of one firm or market will lead to the complete collapse of the system. Thus, identifying weak links is critical…If the collapse in the cryptocurrency market is related to the collapse in traditional financial markets, perhaps we should be concerned about systemic risk,” according to Oxford.

As February and March showed, the cryptocurrency market is very sensitive to what happens in the stock market. The price of bitcoin has fallen following the quotations of the world’s leading indices, the U.S. S&P 500 and the German DAX. However, from an economic perspective, there is an inverse correlation, and it will get higher the more capital comes into the crypto industry. The reason is as follows: The average citizen is the main engine of the economy. First, he buys goods and uses services. In this way, income is generated from businesses, which then become wages for employees. Companies also allocate part of their profits to the development of production, so that their products grow in quality and quantity. Secondly, people use the services of banks. These include transfers, loans, and most importantly, deposits.

When an entity lends its savings to a financial institution for safekeeping, it gives it operating capital. Banks use it, for example, to give loans to entrepreneurs. They direct this capital to business development, so that the products and services produced become better in quality and quantity (again, in theory). In this way households help the development of entrepreneurship. Third, citizens and companies pay taxes. These funds, in turn, go to the development of financial and social infrastructure, the military-industrial complex, and so on. To put it differently, when a citizen spends or invests in a bank, the funds work for him and for the state as a whole. For this reason, if the cryptocurrency suddenly depreciates, it will boomerang on the global economy: ordinary people will lose some of their savings, due to which the spending will decrease, and GDP growth will slow down.

Fantasy or preparation for the future?

We can speculate a lot about how cryptocurrency will die and why it will happen. However, the described scenario is unlikely to happen. Governments of different countries are also competitors. Therefore, if one prohibits bitcoin, the other may take advantage of this and, on the contrary, legalize crypto-assets. This will help the development of digital technologies and attract capital, both monetary and mental. At the same time, one cannot deny that cryptocurrency itself is, by design, a competitor for governments. Bitcoin was originally conceived as a payment system independent of anyone. Because of this, it is likely that states will put more and more pressure on barely controlled crypto-assets as they issue their own national digital currencies. Time will tell where this will lead. – Commissions and rates. How to Predict Exchange Bankruptcy and Save Your Money – Regulation and Taxes. What will happen to bitcoin after halving – Destroying bitcoin is real.

The post One Day Later. What Would Happen in the World If Cryptocurrency Didn’t Happen? appeared first on B_Sai.

Money has changed human society by enabling commercial and trade transactions even between geographic regions that are far apart. It has made possible the movement of wealth and resources across space and time. But for most of human history, it has also been a subject of greed and waste.

Now money is about to undergo a change that could transform banking, finance, and even the structure of society. Most remarkably, the era of physical, or cash, money is coming to an end, even in low- and middle-income countries; the era of digital currencies is coming. In both the national and international arenas, a new phase of competition between official and private currencies is about to begin. The proliferation of digital technologies that is driving this transformation could spur useful innovations and increase access to basic financial services. But there is a risk that technology could increase the concentration of economic power and allow large corporations and governments to further interfere in our financial and personal lives.

Traditional financial institutions, especially commercial banks, are having difficulty with their business models, as new technology makes online banks, which can reach more customers, and online platforms, which provide a direct link between depositors and borrowers, more common. These institutions and platforms increase competition, foster innovation and reduce costs. Depositors have access to an expanded array of savings, credit and insurance products, and small businesses can secure financing from sources other than banks, which typically have strict credit assessment and collateral requirements. Making domestic and international payments becomes cheaper and faster, which benefits consumers and businesses alike.

Concerns about stability

Initially, it seemed that the emergence of cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin was likely to revolutionize payments. Cryptocurrency transactions do not depend on central banks or trusted intermediaries such as commercial banks and credit card companies, eliminating the inefficiencies and added costs associated with these intermediaries. However, their price volatility, as well as transaction volume and processing time constraints, have made cryptocurrencies inefficient as a medium of exchange. New forms of cryptocurrencies, called “stabelcoins,” most of which, oddly enough, are backed by central bank reserve money and government securities, have become more common as a means of payment. The underlying distributed ledger technology is driving a massive monetary change that will deeply affect households, businesses, investors, central banks, and governments. This technology, by providing secure ownership of purely digital objects, is even driving the emergence of new digital assets, such as non-interchangeable tokens.

At the same time, central banks are concerned about the implications for financial and economic stability if decentralized payment systems (offshoots of bitcoin) or private stackcoins displace both cash and traditional payment systems run by regulated financial institutions. A payment infrastructure that is entirely in the hands of the private sector can be efficient and cheap, but some parts of it may cease to function if credibility is lost in times of financial turmoil. Without a functioning payment system, the modern economy would grind to a halt.

In response to such concerns, central banks are considering issuing central bank money in digital form for retail payments – central bank digital currencies (CBCs). The rationale ranges from increasing financial inclusion (providing easy access to a free digital payment system even for those without a bank account) to improving the efficiency and stability of payment systems by creating a public option for payments as a support mechanism (cash currently plays this role).

The CSEC has other potential benefits as well. It will discourage illegal activities such as drug transactions, money laundering, and terrorist financing that rely on anonymous money transactions. It will help bring much of the economic activity out of the shadows into the formal economy, making tax evasion more difficult. Small businesses would benefit from lower transaction costs and avoid the hassles and risks associated with using cash.

The risk of mass withdrawals from bank accounts

However, CSEC also has disadvantages. First, it poses risks to the banking system. Commercial banks are critical to the creation and distribution of credit that keeps the economy running smoothly. What if households moved their money from regular bank accounts to digital wallets from the central bank, perceiving them as more secure, even if they do not accrue interest? If commercial banks ran out of deposits, the central bank could find itself in the undesirable position of having to take over the distribution of credit and deciding which sectors and firms deserve to borrow. Moreover, the central bank’s retail payment system could even wipe out private sector innovations aimed at making digital payments cheaper and faster.

Of equal concern is the potential loss of privacy. Even with privacy protections in place, any central bank will want to keep verifiable records of transactions to ensure that its digital currency is only used for legitimate purposes. Thus, the CFTC poses the risk of ultimately destroying any vestiges of anonymity and privacy in commercial transactions. Careful design of digital currencies using rapidly evolving technical innovations can mitigate many of these risks. Nevertheless, despite all of its benefits, the prospect of eventually supplanting cash with CSDs should not be taken lightly.

New technology could make it difficult for a central bank to perform its key functions, namely keeping unemployment and inflation low by regulating interest rates. When a central bank, such as the Federal Reserve, changes its key interest rate, it understandably affects interest rates on commercial bank deposits and loans. However, if the proliferation of digital credit platforms reduces the role of commercial banks in mediating between depositors and borrowers, it will be unclear how this transmission mechanism of monetary policy will continue to function and whether it will continue to function.

Competition of currencies

The basic functions of money issued by the central bank are on the verge of change. Just a century ago, private currencies competed with each other and with government-issued currencies, also known as fiduciary money. The emergence of central banks has decisively shifted the balance in favor of fiduciary money, which serves as a unit of account, a medium of exchange, and a means of savings. The emergence of various forms of digital currencies and the technology behind them has now separated these functions of money and created direct competitors to fiduciary money in some areas.
Unless market forces are controlled, some money issuers and payment technology providers could become dominant.

Central bank currencies are likely to retain their importance as a means of savings and, for countries that issue them in digital form, also as a means of exchange. Nevertheless, the importance of payment systems that mediate privately is likely to grow, increasing the competition between various forms of private money and central bank money for the role of medium of exchange. Unless market forces are controlled, some money issuers and payment technology providers could become dominant. Some of these changes may affect the very nature of money – how it is created, what forms it takes, and what role it plays in the economy.

International money flows

New forms of money and new channels of movement of funds within and between countries will change international capital flows, exchange rates and the structure of the international monetary system. Some of these changes will have great benefits; others will create new difficulties.

International financial transactions will become faster, cheaper and more transparent. These changes will be a boon for investors seeking to diversify their portfolios, firms seeking to raise money in global capital markets, and economic migrants sending money back to their home countries. Faster and cheaper cross-border payments will also stimulate trade, which will be especially beneficial for emerging and developing countries, which depend on export revenues for a significant share of their GDP.

However, the emergence of new channels for cross-border flows will facilitate not only international trade but also illicit financial flows, creating new challenges for regulators and governments. It will also make it more difficult for governments to monitor cross-border flows of legitimate investment capital. This poses particular problems for emerging economies, which periodically suffer economic crises as a result of large sudden outflows of foreign capital. These countries will be even more vulnerable to monetary policy measures by the world’s major central banks that could trigger capital outflows.

A central bank’s digital money is as reliable and trustworthy as the institution that issues it.

Neither the emergence of a central bank, nor the lowering of barriers to international financial flows, will by themselves have a significant impact on changing the international monetary system or the balance of power between major currencies. The cost of direct transactions between pairs of emerging market currencies is falling, reducing the need for “key currencies” such as the dollar and the euro. However, the major reserve currencies, especially the dollar, are likely to maintain their dominance as a savings vehicle because this dominance depends not only on the size of the economy and the depth of the issuing country’s financial market, but also on the strength of the institutional framework that is needed to maintain investor confidence. Technology cannot replace an independent central bank and the rule of law.

Similarly, central banks will not address major deficiencies with respect to central bank credibility or other issues, such as the government’s disorganized fiscal policy, which affects the value of the national currency. When the government runs significant budget deficits, the assumption that the central bank can be instructed to create more money to finance these deficits tends to increase inflation and reduce the purchasing power of central bank money, both physical and digital. In other words, central bank digital money has as much credibility and trust as the institution that issues it.

The role of government

In the coming years, central banks and governments around the world will have important decisions to make about whether to resist the adoption of new financial technologies, passively embrace the innovations offered by the private sector, or take advantage of the potential efficiency gains that new technologies provide. The emergence of cryptocurrencies and the prospect of CSDs raise important questions about the role the state should play in financial markets: whether it should intrude into areas preferably left to the private sector and whether it can compensate for market inefficiencies, especially the large number of households unbanked or underbanked, in developing countries and even in advanced economies such as the US.

As the recent ups and downs associated with cryptocurrency show, regulation of this sector will be important to maintain the integrity of payment systems and financial markets, provide adequate investor protection, and promote financial stability. Nevertheless, given the vast demand for more efficient payment services at the retail, wholesale, and cross-border levels, private-sector-led financial innovation can bring significant benefits to households and businesses. In this respect, the key challenge for central banks and financial regulators is to balance financial innovation with the need to reduce risks to uninformed investors and overall financial stability.

New financial technologies promise to facilitate even poor households’ access to a range of financial products and services, thereby democratizing finance. But technological innovations in finance, even those that can deliver more efficient financial intermediation, can have double-edged consequences for income and wealth inequality.

The benefits of innovations in financial technology can come mainly from wealthy individuals who can use them to increase financial returns and diversify risk, while existing financial institutions can exploit these changes for their own benefit. Moreover, because those who are economically excluded have limited access to digital technologies and lack financial literacy, some changes may create investment opportunities for them whose risks they are not fully aware of or which are unacceptable to them. Thus, the implications for income and wealth inequality, which have increased dramatically in many countries and contribute to political and social tensions, are far from clear.

Another key change will be an increase in stratification, both nationally and internationally. Small economies and countries with weak institutions may see their central banks and currencies lose weight, with even more economic and financial power concentrated in the hands of large economies. Meanwhile, large corporations, such as Amazon and Meta, could increase their influence by controlling both trade and finance.

Even in a world with decentralized finance built around bitcoin’s innovative distributed ledger technology (which is likely to be its true legacy), governments play an important role in enforcing contractual and property rights, protecting investors, and ensuring financial stability. In the end, it seems that cryptocurrencies and innovative financial products also work better when they are built on trust from government oversight and control. Governments have a responsibility to ensure that the laws and measures they pass promote fair competition, rather than favoring incumbent market players or allowing larger players to stifle smaller competitors.

Centralization or fragmentation

Financial innovation will create new and as yet unknown risks, especially if market players and regulators place undue trust in technology. Decentralization and its corollary, fragmentation, have advantages and disadvantages. They can increase financial stability by reducing centralized weaknesses and increase resilience through greater power reserves. On the other hand, while fragmented systems can work properly under good conditions, in difficult circumstances, confidence in them can be fragile. If the financial system is dominated by decentralized mechanisms that are not directly supported (like banks) by a central bank or other government agency, confidence can easily evaporate. Thus, decentralization can provide efficiency in good conditions and lead to rapid destabilization in tough economic times.

Also, significant changes in the structure of society are possible in the near future. The displacement of cash by digital payment systems could eliminate any residual privacy in commercial transactions. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies were designed to provide anonymity and eliminate dependence on governments and large financial institutions to conduct trade. However, they could precipitate changes that would eventually lead to privacy breaches. Societies will struggle to control the power of governments as individual freedoms are increasingly compromised.

The post A New Era for Money appeared first on B_Sai.